Prepare governance work faster while keeping decisions with your team.
AI can help prepare drafts and surface relevant information. Authorised people remain responsible for reviewing risks, interpreting requirements, approving decisions, and accepting evidence.
What are the biggest compliance gaps for our document processing system if we extend it to Indian users?
Three gaps identified: no consent mechanism for Indian data subjects (India DPDP Act 2023, Section 6), no data retention period specified (Section 8), no data processing agreement with the cloud vendor for Indian data residency (DPDP Rules 2025).
Create GapsRisk and control drafting
The assistant reads a system's recorded context and drafts candidate risks and controls. Every draft is reviewed and confirmed by an assigned person before it enters the governance package.
Illustrative example: for a credit-scoring system, the assistant may surface automated-decision considerations that a reviewer would then edit, keep, or dismiss.
The assistant does not create or approve planning items on its own; nothing is applied automatically.
Policy clause drafting
Describe what an obligation should cover. The assistant proposes clause text and suggests links to regulation articles and controls.
Every draft is a starting point for human review, not a finished policy.
Audit history search
Where enabled, ask questions about recorded audit history in plain language and get a direct answer from the actual data.
Illustrative example: 'How many exceptions were granted to the data privacy policy in the last 90 days?'
Regional context assistance
Where enabled, the assistant surfaces the regulations that typically apply based on where a system is deployed - for example UK GDPR and the FCA Consumer Duty for UK retail contexts, or the India DPDP Act 2023 for systems processing Indian personal data.
Applicability decisions remain with the assigned people; the assistant provides context, not a legal opinion.